I read a bunch of picture books this week, and I didn't enjoy each one. In particular, I observed climaxes, watching how the author used and didn't use it. For example, a whole bunch of books didn't have climaxes, or had very weak ones. Sometimes, the story worked; other elements, such as the tone or ideas, were clever enough to keep the book entertaining and engaging. However, other anti-climax stories fell flat on their faces, and were kind of awful. Still, other picture books had clearly defined climaxes, which often made the reading experience more enjoyable.

While reviewing my picture book, I realized I did not have a clearly drawn climax, as it didn't fit my story. However, this ended up being a weakness. With my picture book, I attempted to experiment, zeroing in on a snapshot of life rather than capturing a whole story. While I kept my plot untouched during edits, I realize I never want to do anything without a climax again. I feel the setup works for my intentions, though I never want to attempt an anti-climatic story ever again. In general, it's a really stupid idea, and I now know that through personal experience.

I also read the novel Missing in Action. My first impressions were largely negative, though I completely changed my mind when I reached the ending. The whole thing was full of heart, and I'm excited to discuss the elements of the work in class. Missing in Action made me think about the world in new ways, and I'm eager to hear others thoughts.